[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"legacy:insights\u002Fwms-qc-hold-release:en":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"description":6,"keywords":7,"author":8,"robots":9,"bodyClass":10,"image":11,"jsonld":12,"html":70},"insights\u002Fwms-qc-hold-release","Put away before QC? Hold-and-release must beat verbal “QC said OK” - JEDP Digital Platform","The most costly mistake in the warehouse is treating uninspected or nonconforming batches as available inventory. Follow inspection strategies according to the type of goods; items pending inspection cannot be picked. The QMS conclusion single-point drives shelving and wave availability. Rejected items follow return coordination to avoid mistakenly shipping frozen batches.","QC hold area, quality release, inventory freeze, IQC inbound, WMS quality","Shenzhen Langbowan Information Technology Co., Ltd.","index, follow","page-insights","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fres\u002Fimages\u002Fproduct\u002Fwms-slide6.webp",[13,30,44],{"@context":14,"@type":15,"@id":16,"headline":17,"description":6,"inLanguage":18,"datePublished":19,"dateModified":20,"articleSection":21,"keywords":7,"image":11,"author":22,"publisher":24,"isPartOf":25,"mainEntityOfPage":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","Article","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Finsights\u002Fwms-qc-hold-release#article","Put away before QC? Hold-and-release must beat verbal “QC said OK”","zh-CN","2026-04-29","2026-10-17","WMS · Warehouse",{"@id":23},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002F#organization",{"@id":23},{"@id":26},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Finsights#collection",{"@type":28,"@id":29},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Finsights\u002Fwms-qc-hold-release",{"@context":14,"@type":31,"itemListElement":32},"BreadcrumbList",[33,38,42],{"@type":34,"position":35,"name":36,"item":37},"ListItem",1,"Home","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002F",{"@type":34,"position":39,"name":40,"item":41},2,"Insights","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Finsights",{"@type":34,"position":43,"name":17,"item":29},3,{"@context":14,"@type":45,"@id":46,"mainEntity":47},"FAQPage","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Finsights\u002Fwms-qc-hold-release#faq",[48,54,58,62,66],{"@type":49,"name":50,"acceptedAnswer":51},"Question","Do all materials need to be inspected?",{"@type":52,"text":53},"Answer","Allocate according to the type of goods and supplier risk. Exemption from inspection is also a strategy: it must specify the basis, sampling ratio, and conditions for failure, not 'ignore everything'.",{"@type":49,"name":55,"acceptedAnswer":56},"What should be done if IQC passes but the warehouse is still frozen?",{"@type":52,"text":57},"Most likely the conclusion was not written back or the integration failed silently. Failures should be monitored and reported to warehouse\u002Fquality for follow-up, and verbal approval via WeChat is prohibited.",{"@type":49,"name":59,"acceptedAnswer":60},"Can WMS perform inspection and judgment by itself?",{"@type":52,"text":61},"Can trigger tasks and maintain inventory status; when combined with QMS, the judgment and reporting are based on QMS to avoid having two sets of conclusions.",{"@type":49,"name":63,"acceptedAnswer":64},"Is it related to the quality inspection of production returns?",{"@type":52,"text":65},"Returned materials and returned goods can also be assigned quality inspection strategies to prevent defective items from flowing back to the production line or re-entering pickable inventory.",{"@type":49,"name":67,"acceptedAnswer":68},"Can urgent materials be shelved before inspection?",{"@type":52,"text":69},"Can only go through limited-term exception approval, and usage and term are restricted; unlimited 'use first' is equivalent to canceling the pending inspection gate.","\u003Carticle class=\"insight-article\">\n    \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-container\">\n      \u003Cnav class=\"breadcrumb\" aria-label=\"Breadcrumb\">\n        \u003Ca href=\"\u002F\">Home\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003Cspan class=\"breadcrumb-sep\">\u002F\u003C\u002Fspan>\n        \u003Ca href=\"\u002Finsights\">Insights\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003Cspan class=\"breadcrumb-sep\">\u002F\u003C\u002Fspan>\n        \u003Cspan>WMS · Warehouse\u003C\u002Fspan>\n      \u003C\u002Fnav>\n\n      \u003Cheader class=\"insight-hero\">\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-tags\">\u003Cspan class=\"r-tag\">Pending Lock\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan class=\"r-tag\">Release freeze\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan class=\"r-tag\">IQC\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan class=\"r-tag\">WMS\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n        \u003Ch1>Put away before QC? Hold-and-release must beat verbal “QC said OK”\u003C\u002Fh1>\n        \u003Cp class=\"insight-lede\">The platform had just unloaded urgent materials, and the warehouse manager pushed the pallet into the 'Pending Inspection Area,' but the wave had already locked onto this batch of goods — in the system, it was still available. If 'Pending Inspection' is just a location name, the inspection code cannot prevent misdelivery.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-meta\">\n          \u003Cspan>Updated on 2026-04-29\u003C\u002Fspan>\n          \u003Cspan class=\"dot\" aria-hidden=\"true\">\u003C\u002Fspan>\n          \u003Cspan>~8 min read\u003C\u002Fspan>\n          \u003Cspan class=\"dot\" aria-hidden=\"true\">\u003C\u002Fspan>\n          \u003Cspan>Manufacturing digitalization · WMS · Warehouse\u003C\u002Fspan>\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003C\u002Fheader>\n      \u003Csection class=\"insight-takeaways\">\n        \u003Ch2>What you'll take away\u003C\u002Fh2>\n        \u003Cul>\u003Cli>Pending inspection is an inventory status, not a shelf label; it must not enter available pickable quantity before release.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>The quality inspection strategy configures pending inspection, exemption, sampling\u002Ffull inspection, and pass\u002Ffail flow according to the type of goods. Exempted items must retain documentation and be subject to spot checks.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>When combining QMS, the standards and reports focus on the quality side, WMS is responsible for task triggering and inventory status, and the conclusions are written back as failed business pending items.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Wave allocation must recognize the frozen status; partial release requires batch splitting, and rejected goods should be coordinated with returns.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>First, establish a closed loop for high-risk cargo categories, then expand to the entire warehouse; pursuing JIT without a strategy will only force verbal approvals.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\n      \u003C\u002Fsection>\n\n      \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-layout\">\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-body\">\n\u003Ch2 id=\"夜班月台那一托\">That pile on the night shift platform\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The urgent material truck was delayed by two hours, and the production line was already flooding the shortage message group. The unloader pushed the pallets onto the shelf marked 'Inspection Pending Area,' and the warehouse staff clicked the receipt confirmation in the system— the next moment, the wave algorithm locked this batch of materials into the material picking task for tomorrow morning. The quality inspector only discovered the next morning: this batch hadn’t been unpacked yet.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The controversy has never been about 'whether to test,' but rather\u003Cstrong>Does the system regard 'Not Tested' as unavailable?\u003C\u002Fstrong>The shelf label says 'Pending Inspection,' but the inventory status is 'Available,' and no matter how many times the password is entered, it can't stop the wrong dispatch.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"待检区-为什么挡不住误发\">\"Why can't the 'Pending Inspection Area' prevent mis-shipments?\"\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Many warehouses understand quality inspection as a spatial issue: freeing up some space, putting up a sign. Space is certainly useful, but it cannot solve three things:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Whether the wave and allocation read the quality status\u003C\u002Fstrong>—Don't read it, the batch will be locked to the warehouse anyway.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Where do conclusions come from, and who sees the failures?\u003C\u002Fstrong>——The quality has been judged as qualified, yet it is still frozen in the warehouse; or the quality has not been judged, but it is verbally released in the warehouse.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Where do the goods go after failing?\u003C\u002Fstrong>——The rejected items are still piled next to the qualified goods aisle, and during the busy weekend, they were swept into the pickable area again.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\n\u003Cp>Must be pending inspection\u003Cstrong>Inventory status that cannot be picked or shipped\u003C\u002Fstrong>; Shelf placement guidelines, wave allocation, and outbound review all need to recognize this status. Storage locations are just the execution carrier, not the strategy itself.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"先按货类写策略-再谈-全部待检\">First write strategies by product category, then discuss 'all pending inspection'\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>One-size-fits-all 'full inspection' will clog both the platform and the inspection station during peak periods, forcing verbal clearance; 'full exemption' buries the risk into the production line. The pragmatic approach is a goods category strategy table:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cdiv class=\"table-scroll\">\u003Ctable>\u003Cthead>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Cargo Characteristics\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Common strategies\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>After passing\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>After failing\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Fthead>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>High Risk \u002F New Supplier \u002F Key Dimension Parts\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Pending inspection   Full inspection or enhanced sampling inspection\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Qualified for shelving and available for use\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Freeze Isolation \u002F Refuse Returns\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Stable supplier, historically qualified and stable\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Pending inspection; spot check; configurable frequency reduction\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Same as above\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Same as above, and trigger supplier attention\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Low-risk excipients, assessed and exempt from inspection\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Exempt from inspection upon storage, selective checks retained\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Ready to use\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>If the spot check fails, tighten the strategy\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Expiration Date \u002F Temperature Sensitive\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Pending Inspection   Rules for Reporting Inventory for Inspection\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Available and monitor inventory age\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Freezing and Disposal\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\u003Cp>Exemption from inspection does not mean ignoring it: the basis must be clearly stated (supplier grade, material risk), the sampling ratio, and how the strategy will tighten if the sampling fails. Scheduling for peak receiving periods, waiting inspections will occupy the platform and storage capacity—the strategy table must be viewed together with the schedule, otherwise 'inspection backlog' will once again force verbal release.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"结论只认一个源头\">Conclusions recognize only one source\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The main responsibility on the warehousing side is to trigger IQC (and PQC\u002FOQC as needed) tasks after receiving goods, and to place the inventory in pending inspection\u002Ffrozen\u002Favailable status. Inspection standards, sampling, and reporting should primarily follow the quality side when integrating the quality system, and the warehouse side should not maintain a second set of \"pass\u002Ffail\" conclusions.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>A closed loop can be compressed into a chain:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Receipt confirmation → Pending inspection according to strategy (not pickable) → Generate inspection task → Quality provides release\u002Ffreeze\u002Frejection → Warehouse executes shelving, isolation, or return → Waves only consume available quantity.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The part most prone to failure in the middle is the write-back. Quality has been determined, and the warehouse is still frozen; on-site, a WeChat password will be used instead. The warehouse has been verbally released, but the quality conclusion has not arrived, so the risk of misdelivery is even greater. Integration failures must be addressed.\u003Cstrong>Business To-Do\u003C\u002Fstrong>(Both warehouse management and quality can see it) Do not rely on chatting to defrost before closing. Successful silence or only writing a technical log is equivalent to leaving the gate to luck.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"部分放行-拒收与例外-三种最容易糊弄的分支\">Partial release, rejection, and exceptions: the three most easily confused branches\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Partially qualified.\u003C\u002Fstrong> If partial release is allowed by the business, batches must be split or handled at the line-level status. 'Half pallet qualified, half pallet verbal' is prohibited. The batch-splitting rules must be consistent with batch traceability, otherwise it will be difficult to calculate the impact during a recall.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Refuse \u002F Return.\u003C\u002Fstrong> The flow of non-conforming goods must be able to interface with return coordination to avoid situations where goods are already shelved and then materials are searched for when the warehouse is full. Items in the rejected temporary storage area also cannot be picked; for outbound returns, scanning and documentation must be retained, and stock losses should not be used to cover them up.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Urgent material exception.\u003C\u002Fstrong> When a production line is blocked, exceptions can be allowed for a limited period, but it must include: the authorizer, reason code, applicable batch and quantity, and automatic retrieval upon expiration. The exception list is reviewed in the weekly meeting; if the proportion of exceptions continues to rise, it indicates a problem with the strategy or inspection capacity, rather than 'the system being too strict'.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"分配规则不认状态-前面全白做\">Allocation rules do not recognize status; all previous ones are done in white.\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Pending inspection lock only addresses 'don't consider it available after receipt.' On the outbound side, we still need to ensure:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Wave\u002Fallocation engine skips frozen and pending inspection batches;\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Check the outbound inventory again to intercept it once more, preventing manual batch changes from bypassing the system;\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>FIFO \u002F expiration rules and quality status take effect simultaneously — frozen batches cannot be released from the warehouse just for 'first expired, first out'.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Cp>There is another type of hidden bypass: warehouse staff 'first provide emergency supplies to the production line' outside the system, and later reconcile the accounts using qualified batches. The accounts always show qualified, but the actual materials may have been used before inspection. To address this issue, relying solely on inventory status is not enough; it is necessary to enforce batch scanning through material requisition tasks and randomly check whether the requisitioned batches were ever in the pending inspection window.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Spot-checking scripts is more effective than slogans: Randomly pick a batch received in the past week and check whether unchecked items are already available for picking; randomly pick a frozen batch and try to allocate it to see if it gets blocked; randomly pick an order that is 'qualified but still frozen' and check whether there are pending tasks and whether the closure time is acceptable. The gate is considered established only if all three questions can be demonstrated on the spot.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"和预约-退料-拒收怎么串\">How to connect with appointments, material returns, and rejections\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Occupancy of platforms and storage capacity to be inspected. If scheduled deliveries are only registered but do not occupy a time slot, when quality inspection scheduling coincides with unloading peaks, 'inspection backlog' will force verbal clearance—this is not a matter of quality attitude, but a misalignment of capability and strategy. High-risk goods categories should have their inspection load indicated at the reservation stage, with staggered timing or reserved inspection windows.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Production returns and sales returns can also be matched with quality inspection strategies. Defective items flowing back to the line or re-entering pickable inventory pose risks no less than uninspected incoming materials being shelved. Returns to the warehouse are by default placed in pending inspection or isolation, and after assessment, a decision is made whether to return them to usable stock, scrap them, or return them to the supplier, to prevent the 'returns area' from becoming a second verbal release point.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Rejected temporary storage must be visible, countable, and not pickable. When coordinating with supplier returns, the outbound scan for returns and the reconciliation documents must match, to prevent rejected goods from disappearing in the warehouse and being written off due to inventory discrepancies.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"上线顺序-别一上来全仓强锁\">Order of going online: don't go all-in and forcibly lock everything right away\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cdiv class=\"table-scroll\">\u003Ctable>\u003Cthead>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Stage\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>What are you doing?\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>How to stand firm\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Fthead>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>sample\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>High-risk goods category   Key suppliers: pending inspection lock   Conclusion feedback\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Items not inspected can be intercepted; verbal clearance decreases\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Reinforce\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Failed pending, partial release batch splitting, rejected flow\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Integration failures do not last overnight; rejected items are no longer mixed with qualified channels\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Expand coverage\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Grading strategy for the remaining types of goods; joint adjustment with appointments and FIFO\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Peak periods rely on strategy and scheduling, not on commands\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\u003Cp>When there is no barcode\u002Fbatch identification, first add the identification before discussing status locking—otherwise, the 'lock' will only be on the account, and the goods can still be moved freely. For those who insist on visual judgment in the warehouse and do not accept quality conclusions, the system can at most provide task reminders and cannot prevent mis-shipments. When there is no quality system and it cannot be launched in the short term, at least ensure that 'pending inspection cannot be picked' is reflected in the warehouse status, and specify who has the authority to change the status and how to leave traces after changes; this is the bottom line, not the endgame.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In the warehousing solution, the inbound quality inspection strategy (inspection pending area \u002F qualified for storage \u002F rejected returns) is linked with batch release status precisely to implement the above gate operation rules, rather than issuing another warehouse regulation. In JEDP-WMS, when combining the quality module, inspection reports are not reconstructed on the warehouse side; the warehouse side only needs to manage triggers and inventory status. The dashboard can display frozen batches, long-term pending inspections, and failed integration tasks in the same view, so that before the shift meeting, the queue is checked first, then the inventory numbers.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"判断有没有真的管住\">Determine whether it is really controlled\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>There is no need to blindly believe in a single 'accuracy rate.' A more useful observation is whether cases of undetected stock blockages have occurred, whether there have been any wrongful freezing incidents, whether failures in writing back conclusions are ever left unresolved overnight, and whether the proportion of exceptions is declining. A short-term increase in the number of interceptions is often a good sign—it indicates that the checkpoints are starting to work; if the number remains at zero for a long time but there are still customer complaints or production line complaints that 'there is a problem with the materials,' it is necessary to suspect that bypasses are still present.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 id=\"怎么继续\">What to do next\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Next week, do only one thing: export the receipts from the past seven days, and mark two columns: 'Not inspected but shelved' and 'Frozen but still locked by wave'; randomly select three orders to check whether the issue at the time was a strategy omission, a write-back failure, or an exception without a time limit. Bring the list to the joint meeting of warehouse management and quality assurance, first block high-risk product categories, then discuss warehouse-wide implementation.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cul>\u003Cli>WMS Warehousing Solution: Quality Inspection Strategy and Freeze Release\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>How to leave a time slot for quality inspection when scheduling a delivery\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Incoming material quality closed loop: determining how to return to the supplier\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>FIFO and Batches: How to Recognize Status for Allocation Rules\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n        \u003Caside class=\"insight-toc\" aria-label=\"On this page\">\n          \u003Ch2>Contents\u003C\u002Fh2>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#夜班月台那一托\">That pile on the night shift platform\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#待检区-为什么挡不住误发\">\"Why can't the 'Pending Inspection Area' prevent mis-shipments?\"\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#先按货类写策略-再谈-全部待检\">First write strategies by product category, then discuss 'all pending inspection'\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#结论只认一个源头\">Conclusions recognize only one source\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#部分放行-拒收与例外-三种最容易糊弄的分支\">Partial release, rejection, and exceptions: the three most easily confused branches\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#分配规则不认状态-前面全白做\">Allocation rules do not recognize status; all previous ones are done in white.\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#和预约-退料-拒收怎么串\">How to connect with appointments, material returns, and rejections\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#上线顺序-别一上来全仓强锁\">Order of going online: don't go all-in and forcibly lock everything right away\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#判断有没有真的管住\">Determine whether it is really controlled\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca class=\"h2\" href=\"#怎么继续\">What to do next\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003C\u002Faside>\n      \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\n      \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-cta\">\n        \u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Want to apply this in your plant?\u003C\u002Fstrong>Resources has matching self-assessments and templates—or book a live demo.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-cta-actions\">\n          \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=wms#selftest\" class=\"btn btn-outline\">Self-assessment in Resources\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fcases#case-wms\" class=\"btn btn-outline\">WMS acceptance case\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fcontact?from=wms\" class=\"btn\">Get a demo\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003C!-- next-step:BEGIN -->\u003Ca class=\"btn\" href=\"\u002Fproduct\u002Fwms\">Product solution: \u003Cspan>JEDP-WMS Warehouse Operations\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fa>\u003Ca class=\"btn btn-outline\" href=\"\u002Fres\u002Fresources\u002Fkits\u002F24-wms-appointment-wave-picking.html\">Matching resource kit: \u003Cspan>Inbound appointment + wave picking checklist\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C!-- next-step:END -->\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003Csection class=\"insight-faq\" id=\"faq\">\n        \u003Ch2>FAQ\u003C\u002Fh2>\n        \u003Cp class=\"insight-faq-sub\">Quick answers on this topic—still stuck?\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fcontact?from=wms\">Contact\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"faq-list\">\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\" open>\n          \u003Csummary>Do all materials need to be inspected?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Allocate according to the type of goods and supplier risk. Exemption from inspection is also a strategy: it must specify the basis, sampling ratio, and conditions for failure, not 'ignore everything'.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>What should be done if IQC passes but the warehouse is still frozen?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Most likely the conclusion was not written back or the integration failed silently. Failures should be monitored and reported to warehouse\u002Fquality for follow-up, and verbal approval via WeChat is prohibited.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Can WMS perform inspection and judgment by itself?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Can trigger tasks and maintain inventory status; when combined with QMS, the judgment and reporting are based on QMS to avoid having two sets of conclusions.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Is it related to the quality inspection of production returns?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Returned materials and returned goods can also be assigned quality inspection strategies to prevent defective items from flowing back to the production line or re-entering pickable inventory.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Can urgent materials be shelved before inspection?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Can only go through limited-term exception approval, and usage and term are restricted; unlimited 'use first' is equivalent to canceling the pending inspection gate.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003C\u002Fsection>\n      \u003Csection class=\"insight-related\">\n        \u003Ch2>Related reading\u003C\u002Fh2>\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"insight-related-grid\">\n          \u003Carticle class=\"r-card\">\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-tags\">WMS · Warehouse\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n            \u003Ch3>Three trucks at 9am, empty dock all afternoon? Appointments must consume unload capacity, not a remarks field\u003C\u002Fh3>\n            \u003Cp>Receiving congestion often occurs because appointments are only registered but do not occupy resources. Create a closed loop of occupancy—check-in—closure by linking time windows, docks, unloading capacity, and ASN; integrate tardiness, no-shows, and urgent queue-jumping into rules and performance; prioritize strategic appointments on peak days...\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-meta\">2026-03-26 · ~8 min\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C\u002Farticle>\n          \u003Carticle class=\"r-card\">\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-tags\">QMS · Quality\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n            \u003Ch3>IQC and supplier quality as two skins—weld the loop at four nodes\u003C\u002Fh3>\n            \u003Cp>Incoming material inspection is not the end point of the quality department, but the starting point of supplier quality management. From pending inspections, concession disputes, verbal corrections to 'evaluation is useless', breaking down tasks into triggers, determining separation, transmitting anomalies, and performance feedback in four places...\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-meta\">2026-05-21 · ~10 min\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C\u002Farticle>\n          \u003Carticle class=\"r-card\">\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-tags\">WMS · Warehouse\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n            \u003Ch3>Why does the nearest pallet always ship? FIFO needs hard blocks, not wall posters\u003C\u002Fh3>\n            \u003Cp>FIFO failure is usually not because the warehouse is uncooperative, but because the recommendation can be easily bypassed. It should be designed with three levels of enforcement: reminders, verification, and locking, with exceptions requiring authorization and review; inventory management and batch mixing prohibition are prerequisites, and are linked with wave picking...\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"r-meta\">2026-04-23 · ~9 min\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C\u002Farticle>\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003C\u002Fsection>\n    \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n  \u003C\u002Farticle>",1793937990820]