[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":85},["ShallowReactive",2],{"legacy:product\u002Fsrm:en":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"description":6,"keywords":7,"author":8,"robots":9,"bodyClass":10,"image":11,"jsonld":12,"html":84},"product\u002Fsrm","JEDP-SRM Supplier Relationship Management System - JEDP Digital Platform","JEDP-SRM Supplier Relationship Management System: qualification, sourcing, order collaboration, delivery scheduling and reconciliation payment; quality and finance collaboration, supplier portal and group multi-organization control for assured supply, lower cost and higher efficiency.","JEDP, SRM, supplier management, procurement coordination, reconciliation payments, financial coordination, digital platform, Lang Bowan","Shenzhen Langbowan Information Technology Co., Ltd.","index, follow","page-products","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fres\u002Fimages\u002Fproduct\u002Fsrm-slide6.webp",[13,30,58],{"@context":14,"@type":15,"itemListElement":16},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","BreadcrumbList",[17,22,26],{"@type":18,"position":19,"name":20,"item":21},"ListItem",1,"Home","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002F",{"@type":18,"position":23,"name":24,"item":25},2,"Products","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fproducts",{"@type":18,"position":27,"name":28,"item":29},3,"JEDP-SRM Supplier Relationship Management","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fproduct\u002Fsrm",{"@context":14,"@type":31,"@id":32,"name":28,"applicationCategory":33,"applicationSubCategory":34,"operatingSystem":35,"inLanguage":36,"description":6,"url":29,"provider":40,"isPartOf":42,"offers":44,"featureList":51},"SoftwareApplication","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fproduct\u002Fsrm#software","BusinessApplication","Supplier Relationship Management System","Web (browser access; SaaS multi-tenant, private deployment assessed by scenario)",[37,38,39],"zh-CN","zh-TW","en",{"@id":41},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002F#organization",{"@id":43},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002F#software",{"@type":45,"url":46,"availability":47,"priceSpecification":48},"Offer","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fcontact?from=srm","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FInStock",{"@type":49,"priceCurrency":50},"PriceSpecification","CNY",[52,53,54,55,56,57],"Supplier Lifecycle: Covers registration access, master data, licenses and risk tags, performance evaluation, and rectification elimination. The observation period, red-line items, and evidence attachments can be configured to block 'formalities-only access' before cooperation begins, and link it with subsequent shares\u002Frectification.","Demand & Sourcing: The demand pool undertaking plan handles material shortages and purchase requests; the process of inquiry, bidding, and tendering is traceable, and price comparisons are auditable. Winning bids\u002Fpricing results can be transferred to procurement execution, preventing sourcing conclusions from being lost in chats and spreadsheets and becoming untraceable.","Order & Delivery Collaboration: Please proceed with the release—confirmation—activation state machine; separate delivery scheduling and response into 'commitment' and 'feedback.' Complete sets and delivery achievements are counted by line; changes must be versioned and confirmed a second time, preventing verbal rushes from contaminating the plan.","Quality collaboration: Incoming material inspection conclusions are visible to both procurement and suppliers; 8D\u002Fdeviation corrections flow online, with SQE, procurement, and suppliers sharing the same handling and deadline view, avoiding a disconnect between quality and supply.","Finance Collaboration: Reconciliation confirmation, invoice application and verification, and payment application are interconnected; accounts payable terms and write-offs are visible. Differences such as outsourcing and losses must be traceable to material issuance and receipt, process outsourcing, and other document checkpoints, rather than being reconciled against Excel at the end of the period.","Portal & Group Control: Suppliers can collaborate through a lightweight portal or confirmation link; multiple subsidiaries of the group are on the same platform, with permissions inherited according to the organization. The overseas portal can enable multiple languages, with missing translations falling back to the original text to ensure uninterrupted collaboration abroad.",{"@context":14,"@type":59,"@id":60,"mainEntity":61},"FAQPage","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jedp.cn\u002Fproduct\u002Fsrm#faq",[62,68,72,76,80],{"@type":63,"name":64,"acceptedAnswer":65},"Question","Which stages are covered by JEDP-SRM's full lifecycle management of suppliers?",{"@type":66,"text":67},"Answer","From registration and master data through performance to corrective exit in one chain. Red-line or watch tags should block new orders. Incoming quality and 8D reconcile with QMS on the same business key within scope, so purchasing is not left outside a quality-only loop.",{"@type":63,"name":69,"acceptedAnswer":70},"Can inquiries, bidding, and tenders be coordinated online?",{"@type":66,"text":71},"Yes. The demand pool and RFQ \u002F bidding \u002F tender processes leave a trail, and award conclusions must land on the order price version. Storing only a negotiated price while the process stays in chat does not count as finished collaboration.",{"@type":63,"name":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"Does it support delivery scheduling and kit analysis?",{"@type":66,"text":75},"Yes. Order confirmation, promised dates, and kit risk share one state machine; ship plans \u002F ASN can connect to WMS appointment receiving. Verbal date changes without a second confirmation in the system will distort kit checks.",{"@type":63,"name":77,"acceptedAnswer":78},"Can reconciliation, invoicing, and payment be connected?",{"@type":66,"text":79},"Yes. Statements are cut at a defined point and only after supplier confirmation move into invoice and payment requests. Variances must drill to receipt or outsourcing documents. The AP ledger still follows ERP; SRM owns collaboration evidence and status.",{"@type":63,"name":81,"acceptedAnswer":82},"How does a group manage multiple organizations?",{"@type":66,"text":83},"Supplier portal and internal purchasing see the same order confirmation, ASN, and statement status. Multi-entity companies isolate by org \u002F tenant so buyer A cannot see company B order lines.","\u003Csection class=\"product-detail-section page-section\">\n    \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-container\">      \u003Cnav class=\"breadcrumb\" aria-label=\"Breadcrumb\">\n        \u003Ca href=\"\u002F\">Home\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003Cspan class=\"breadcrumb-sep\">\u002F\u003C\u002Fspan>\n        \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fproducts\">Products\u003C\u002Fa>\n        \u003Cspan class=\"breadcrumb-sep\">\u002F\u003C\u002Fspan>\n        \u003Cspan>SRM\u003C\u002Fspan>\n      \u003C\u002Fnav>\n      \u003Cdiv class=\"product-detail\">\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-header\">\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-icon\">\u003Ci class=\"fas fa-file-contract\">\u003C\u002Fi>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv>\n            \u003Ch1>JEDP-SRM Supplier Relationship Management\u003C\u002Fh1>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-subtitle\">Integrate sourcing, orders, delivery, quality, and reconciliation into an auditable collaborative chain—ensuring supply, reducing costs, and improving efficiency are all based on the 'same effective document'.\u003C\u002Fp>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n        \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\n        \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-content\">\n                    \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Solution Positioning\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">After the shortage meeting ends, three screenshots still disagree: ERP demand, delivery promises in WeChat, and Excel reconciliation. JEDP-SRM targets discrete manufacturing and auto-parts supply chains, putting supplier lifecycle from onboarding to exit on the same platform as sourcing, PO collaboration, delivery scheduling, incoming quality, and finance reconciliation—so purchasing, planning, SQE, and finance share one state machine.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">Collaboration has to post: confirms, changes, replies, and statement variances must land on documents, not in chat or screenshots. Standalone or combined with WMS receipt, QMS incoming, and MES shortage plans on the same platform; group companies can isolate databases, and overseas portals can enable a locale.\u003C\u002Fp>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Where It Fits\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cul class=\"pain-list\">\n              \u003Cli>Sourcing, outsourcing, and reconciliation are fragmented offline; delivery scheduling and order responses rely on reminders and inquiries; material shortage meetings have degenerated into screenshot confrontations; supply assurance and cost reduction lack a unified set of facts.\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>An 'order sent out' does not equal 'confirmed'; verbal rush requests and feedback stuck in chat cause misalignment between complete planning and reconciliations.\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Supplier performance and 8D\u002Fdeviation rectification are disconnected; the admission score looks good, but licenses, red lines, and rectification evidence chain are missing\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Reconciliation, invoicing, and payments rely on manual matching; it is difficult to timely control accounts payable periods and write-offs, and discrepancies in outsourced material issuance\u002Fwastage only explode at the end of the period.\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Core Process\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Col class=\"process-flow-steps\">\n              \u003Cli>Onboarding & Performance\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Demand & Sourcing\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Order Collaboration\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Delivery & Kit Completeness\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Reconciliation & Payment\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Fol>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Core Capabilities\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cul class=\"capability-list\">\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Supplier Lifecycle\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>Covers registration access, master data, licenses and risk tags, performance evaluation, and rectification elimination. The observation period, red-line items, and evidence attachments can be configured to block 'formalities-only access' before cooperation begins, and link it with subsequent shares\u002Frectification.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Demand & Sourcing\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>The demand pool takes shortages and requisitions. RFQ, auction, and tender stay auditable. Prices are written to the price master before they become purchase orders, so sourcing decisions do not stay in chat or spreadsheets.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Order & Delivery Collaboration\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>Requisitions become orders through publish, confirm, and effective states. Delivery schedules and replies keep promise and response apart. Kit and on-time delivery are counted by line. Changes need a new version and a second confirmation. Subcontracting covers material issue, receipt, and loss, and the differences go into reconciliation.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Quality collaboration\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>Incoming material inspection conclusions are visible to both procurement and suppliers; 8D\u002Fdeviation corrections flow online, with SQE, procurement, and suppliers sharing the same handling and deadline view, avoiding a disconnect between quality and supply.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Finance Collaboration\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>Reconciliation confirmation, invoice application and verification, and payment application are interconnected; accounts payable terms and write-offs are visible. Differences such as outsourcing and losses must be traceable to material issuance and receipt, process outsourcing, and other document checkpoints, rather than being reconciled against Excel at the end of the period.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Portal & Group Control\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan>Suppliers can collaborate through a lightweight portal or confirmation link; multiple subsidiaries of the group are on the same platform, with permissions inherited according to the organization. The overseas portal can enable multiple languages, with missing translations falling back to the original text to ensure uninterrupted collaboration abroad.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Scope of functions\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">The table lists the modules under the six capabilities, and how a rule advances the next document. Approval, judgment, and write-off stay with a person.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"table-scroll\">\u003Ctable>\u003Cthead>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Core Capabilities\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Modules in scope\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Rule advance\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Fthead>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Supplier Lifecycle\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Registration, master data, performance, remediation, and exit\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>A red line or probation blocks the next order.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Demand & Sourcing\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Demand pool, RFQ, auction, tender, and price master\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>An approved price writes back to the price master.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Order & Delivery Collaboration\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Order confirmation, subcontract issue and receipt, delivery schedule, and supplier reply\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>A requisition creates the purchase order. The delivery plan uses the work order, stock, and in-transit quantity. The order still needs confirmation.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Quality collaboration\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Incoming results, 8D, and deviations\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>An incoming failure attaches to the order line. Purchasing and the supplier see the same action.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Finance Collaboration\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Statements, invoice requests, and payment requests\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>The statement is created and the prepayment is applied. The payment plan follows confirmation.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Portal & Group Control\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Supplier portal and multi-organization isolation\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>The hall opens when the auction or bid opening is ready. After notices are sent, the project is archived and synced to ERP.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">Solution Snapshot\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Platform Boost\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cdiv class=\"platform-boost\">\n              \u003Carticle>\u003Ch3>AI Agents\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Design-time speeds up sourcing, order collaboration, and reconciliation forms and flows; the result can still be edited in the designer. Runtime can query and complete reviews within that person's own permissions through the API; it does not approve for someone else and does not change prices.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Farticle>\n              \u003Carticle>\u003Ch3>Reports and dashboards\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Delivery fulfillment (including OTIF at the line level), accounts payable aging, supplier performance and overdue rectifications can generate reports, dashboards, and large screens; the metrics are sourced the same as orders\u002Fstatements to avoid each supplier meeting having its own separate report.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Farticle>\n              \u003Carticle>\u003Ch3>Multi-language\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>The overseas supplier portal and collaboration interface can be enabled in the corresponding language, with missing translations reverting to the original text; order status, confirmation\u002Frejection, and key reconciliation button copy are prioritized to reduce the communication cost of cross-border order responses and reconciliation.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Farticle>\n              \u003Carticle>\u003Ch3>Multi-tenant\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Subsidiary company procurement can be isolated by separate databases, supporting parallel multi-organization operations and SaaS account opening for the group; permissions are inherited by organization, and supplier master data, orders, and price ranges are consolidated within tenant boundaries, prohibiting cross-tenant visibility.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Farticle>\n            \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n                              \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Boundaries & Composition\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">SRM is responsible for the supplier collaboration side of the \"confirmation, response, rectification, and reconciliation\" evidence chain; the material master data, accounts payable ledger, and cost accounting still rely on the enterprise's main system (such as ERP) as the standard, with statuses and amounts written back through integration, rather than creating a new financial middle platform.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">The integration touchpoints with WMS are delivery appointment\u002Freceiving and batch; with QMS it is incoming material defects and supplier 8D; with MES it is material shortage and readiness plan. During selection and acceptance, the main responsible system for these three interfaces and the visibility of failures should be finalized first, then the portal aesthetics can be discussed.\u003C\u002Fp>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C!-- product-depth:BEGIN -->\n\u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n\n            \n            \n            \u003Ch2>Typical breakpoints\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cdiv class=\"table-scroll\">\u003Ctable>\u003Cthead>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Breakpoint\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Common cause\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Control lever\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Fthead>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>The order has been shipped, but the schedule is still according to the old delivery date.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Missing confirmation\u002Facknowledgment state machine\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Release—Confirm—Effective + Answer and Submit Risk Identification\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>The conclusion about the source is only in the chat.\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>ERP only stores the pricing results\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Inquiry\u002FBidding Process Trace + Pricing Approval\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Outsourced reconciliation only explodes at the end of the period\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Material Issued \u002F Loss \u002F Finished Goods Not Online\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Outsourced document chain automatic trigger + Reconciliation cut-off point\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Defective incoming materials, procurement unaware\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Quality collaboration did not write back to the procurement view\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Non-conforming\u002F8D linked with order line\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>The demand pool is always 'inquiring'\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Status rules and pricing are not closed-loop\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Requirement Pool State Machine + Price Master Data Activation\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Supplier portal and ERP two sets of statuses\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Integration direction and failure are invisible\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Key Status Two-Way Reconciliation Alarm\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Delivery schedule does not match on-site material shortages\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Requirement extraction definition \u002F outsourcing not included\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Requirement Detail Management + Schedule Revision Traceability\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n            \u003Ch2>Responsibility and Integration\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">\u003Cstrong>Primary Responsibility:\u003C\u002Fstrong>SRM has supplier collaboration features such as registration access, sourcing process, order confirmation and changes, response\u002Fdelivery, incoming material quality event collaboration, reconciliation and invoicing, and payment application evidence; the materials and accounts payable general ledger still follow ERP, with SRM writing back execution status and collaboration conclusions through the integration engine.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">\u003Cstrong>Integration Direction (Typical):\u003C\u002Fstrong>Agree on 'who generates the event \u002F who books the entry \u002F who pushes the portal' — ERP ←→ Purchase Requisition\u002FPurchase Order\u002FGoods Receipt\u002FPayment Voucher (materials and general ledger are based on ERP); PLM → Drawings and sourcing attachments; QMS → SRM writes back incoming inspection results\u002Fnon-conformities and 8D (supplier corrective collaboration is visible in SRM); SRM → WMS pushes ASN\u002Fappointments and delivery; MES → SRM shortage\u002Fcompleteness requirements (optional, supports delivery scheduling). Integration failures must be visible to the business.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Ch2>Promote phased implementation and acceptance\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cul class=\"accept-list\">\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Phase One (Master Data and Portal)\u003C\u002Fstrong>Supplier classification and access strategy, material\u002Fprocurement attributes, internal and external portal accounts and organizational separation; complete registration—access—qualified status conversion sampling\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Phase II (Execution Chain)\u003C\u002Fstrong>: Demand pool, request for sourcing, order confirmation and change versions, delivery scheduling and feedback; joint testing with WMS receiving and QMS incoming inspection\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Phase Three (Sourcing and Finance)\u003C\u002Fstrong>: Inquiry\u002Fbidding\u002Ftendering and price master data, full chain of outsourcing, reconciliation—invoicing—payment planning; OTIF\u002Fdelivery on time, confirmation rate, line-level demonstration of reconciliation differences\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>The report dashboard and orders\u002Fstatements share the same source, and suppliers are prohibited from each bringing a separate manual sheet to the regular meetings.\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Supplier performance evaluation and rectification\u002Felimination status can be traced back to access and order performance, rather than a one-time year-end score.\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n            \u003Ch2>When not to apply\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cul class=\"pain-list\">\n              \u003Cli>Hoping SRM will replace ERP general ledger and cost accounting — collaborative evidence in SRM, financial postings still in the main system\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>No discipline for order confirmation, changes rely entirely on verbal communication—state machine should be solidified first before discussing portal experience\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Incoming material inspection and CAPA are all built in SRM—when combined with QMS, standards, inspection records, and system evidence are primarily the responsibility of QMS.\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Refusing integrated management but demanding OTIF to be real-time and accurate — requires ERP\u002FMES\u002FWMS supply-demand and receipt status to originate from the same source\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \n          \n          \u003C!-- product-depth:END -->\n\n\u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\">\n            \u003Ch2>Related Practices\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cp class=\"detail-lead\">Public cases and solution scenarios are presented according to the desensitization standards; more detailed breakpoints and acceptance criteria can be found in the industry insights and resource center self-tests.\u003C\u002Fp>\n            \u003Cul class=\"related-cases\">\n              \u003Cli>Precision manufacturing: subcontracting through reconciliation\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Downstream Warehouse Coordination: Goods Receipt and Account Reconciliation Traceability\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Buyer says sent, supplier says unseen? Order collaboration starts on one effective PO\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Resource: Supplier Management Maturity Self-Assessment\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Product: WMS Scheduled Receiving and ASN Implementation\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Product: QMS Incoming Material Nonconformance and 8D Evidence\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n                                                                                                                                            \u003C!-- related-insights:BEGIN -->\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"detail-section\" id=\"related-insights\">\n            \u003Ch2>Related insights\u003C\u002Fh2>\n            \u003Cul class=\"related-cases\">\n              \u003Cli>Purchasing as a relay: supplier says shipped, warehouse says no lines—why in-transit never ties\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Consignment shows stock on both sides but never ties? Unify ownership and the consumption booking point first\u003C\u002Fli>\n              \u003Cli>Claim raised but money never deducted? Quality debit must hit AP—not sit in email attachments\u003C\u002Fli>\n            \u003C\u002Ful>\n            \u003Cp class=\"related-more\">\u003Ca href=\"\u002Finsights\">Browse all insights\u003C\u002Fa> · \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#selftest\">Take an online self-test\u003C\u002Fa> · \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#kits\">Download kits\u003C\u002Fa> · \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#demo\">Book a demo\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n          \u003C!-- related-insights:END -->\n          \u003Cdiv class=\"product-detail-cta scroll-reveal\">\n            \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fproducts\" class=\"btn btn-outline\">Back to product solutions\u003C\u002Fa>\n            \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#selftest\" class=\"btn btn-outline\">Take a self-test\u003C\u002Fa>\n            \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#kits\" class=\"btn btn-ghost\">Download kits\u003C\u002Fa>\n            \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fresources?from=srm#demo\" class=\"btn btn-ghost\">Book a demo\u003C\u002Fa>\n            \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fcontact?from=srm\" class=\"btn\">Get a demo\u003C\u002Fa>\n          \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n      \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n    \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n  \u003C\u002Fsection>\n\n  \u003C!-- GEO:faq-visible:BEGIN · 由 scripts\u002Finject_geo.py 生成，请勿手改 -->\n  \u003Csection class=\"contact-faq page-section\" id=\"faq\">\n    \u003Ch2 class=\"section-title\">FAQ\u003C\u002Fh2>\n    \u003Cp class=\"section-subtitle\">For common questions about the capabilities on this page, take a look here first; if you still have questions, you can contact us.\u003C\u002Fp>\n    \u003Cdiv class=\"faq-list\">\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\" open>\n          \u003Csummary>Which stages are covered by JEDP-SRM's full lifecycle management of suppliers?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>From registration and master data through performance to corrective exit in one chain. Red-line or watch tags should block new orders. Incoming quality and 8D reconcile with QMS on the same business key within scope, so purchasing is not left outside a quality-only loop.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Can inquiries, bidding, and tenders be coordinated online?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Yes. The demand pool and RFQ \u002F bidding \u002F tender processes leave a trail, and award conclusions must land on the order price version. Storing only a negotiated price while the process stays in chat does not count as finished collaboration.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Does it support delivery scheduling and kit analysis?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Yes. Order confirmation, promised dates, and kit risk share one state machine; ship plans \u002F ASN can connect to WMS appointment receiving. Verbal date changes without a second confirmation in the system will distort kit checks.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>Can reconciliation, invoicing, and payment be connected?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Yes. Statements are cut at a defined point and only after supplier confirmation move into invoice and payment requests. Variances must drill to receipt or outsourcing documents. The AP ledger still follows ERP; SRM owns collaboration evidence and status.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n        \u003Cdetails class=\"faq-item\">\n          \u003Csummary>How does a group manage multiple organizations?\u003C\u002Fsummary>\n          \u003Cp>Supplier portal and internal purchasing see the same order confirmation, ASN, and statement status. Multi-entity companies isolate by org \u002F tenant so buyer A cannot see company B order lines.\u003C\u002Fp>\n        \u003C\u002Fdetails>\n    \u003C\u002Fdiv>\n  \u003C\u002Fsection>\n  \u003C!-- GEO:faq-visible:END -->\n\n  \n  \n\n  \n  \n  \n  \u003C!-- GEO:software-app:BEGIN · 由 scripts\u002Finject_geo.py 生成，请勿手改 -->\n  \n  \u003C!-- GEO:software-app:END -->\n  \u003C!-- GEO:faq:BEGIN · 由 scripts\u002Finject_geo.py 生成，请勿手改 -->\n  \n  \u003C!-- GEO:faq:END -->",1793937990207]