JEDP-PMS Project Delivery

Let milestones carry evidence, resources highlight conflicts, and costs enter the same account — scope, schedule, cost, and acceptance can be managed, rather than wish-list-style Gantt charts.

Solution Positioning

Payment is due and the floor still argues whether delivery 'counts as done.' JEDP-PMS covers initiate-to-accept delivery: L1–L3/WBS plans, waterfall and agile practices, resource load, project cost (estimate/budget/actual/final) and acceptance milestones—making change control and evidence packs a process, not an email that says 'later.'

A Gantt without a frozen baseline does not enter acceptance. Scope changes, milestones, and resource load belong in the plan; “we'll see” in email is not a change. Works with CRM contracts, EHR time and org permissions, and expense posting.

Where It Fits

Gantt charts look nice, but without baselines and change control, progress percentages lack a fixed denominator, and scope silently creeps until it explodes at acceptance.
Resources are assigned only to people without considering workload, key roles are overloaded with multiple projects and only revealed when delayed, and portfolio priorities cannot be arbitrated.
Labor hours, procurement, and expenses are recorded in three separate accounts that do not match, costs explode afterward, EAC/ETC are essentially meaningless, and finance and the project each speak their own language.
The acceptance milestone only has a date without an evidence package. Disputes over the scope and completion definition start only a week before payment, resulting in passive collection of funds.

Core Process

Initiation & Baseline
Plan & Resources
Execution & Timesheets
Change Control
Acceptance & Billing

Core Capabilities

WBS & Hierarchical PlanningL1~L3 / WBS decomposition, waterfall and agile work items can be combined. The progress percentage only has a fixed denominator after the baseline is frozen; Gantt charts without a baseline are not included in management standards.
Resources & WorkloadRoles and named resources are layered, and load percentages and conflict warnings are visible during the planning stage. Critical role overloads should enter combination priority arbitration, rather than being discovered only after delays.
Four-stage CostingEstimates, budgets, accounting, and final accounts are assigned to work packages; working hours, procurement, and expenses are recorded in the same account, supporting EAC/ETC warnings, avoiding mismatched three books and post-event explosions.
Change ControlScope changes require approval after impact assessment (schedule/cost/risk); the pending assessment pool and CCB practices can be configured. Prevent the 'let's talk later' in emails from silently spreading.
Milestones & AcceptanceDeliverables, acceptance criteria, and the three outcomes—pass, conditional, fail—are on the milestone. Conditional close carries a due date for leftovers and can trigger payment. The project is closed only after the documents are archived.
Collaboration & Document CompletenessStakeholder communication, complete documentation, and project portfolio views provide evidence entry points for payment collection, audits, and handovers. Milestones come with an evidence package, not just a date.

Scope of functions

The table lists the modules under the six capabilities, and how a rule advances the next document. Approval, judgment, and write-off stay with a person.

Core Capabilities	Modules in scope	Rule advance
WBS & Hierarchical Planning	L1–L3, waterfall and agile, Gantt and board	Progress without a frozen baseline is not accepted.
Resources & Workload	Role load and conflict warnings	Role overload warns during planning.
Four-stage Costing	Estimate, budget, actuals, and final account	After hours and cost are collected, estimate-at-completion variance warns.
Change Control	Impact assessment, change requests, and baseline comparison	A change that skipped impact review cannot be executed.
Milestones & Acceptance	Deliverables, three-state acceptance, archive-to-close, and collection triggers	A milestone cannot close without the evidence pack. Passing it can trigger collection.
Collaboration & Document Completeness	Stakeholders, task inbox, and program documents	A major variance from baseline creates a risk. It does not close by itself.

Solution Snapshot

Platform Boost

AI Agents

Design-time speeds up project forms and change and acceptance flows. Runtime can query and complete reviews within that person's own permissions through the API; it does not bypass change control and does not close risks automatically.

Reports and dashboards

Portfolio dashboards can display combined loads, milestone health, cost deviations, and pending changes to be evaluated; the data comes from WBS / work hours / cost aggregation, rather than creating a separate schedule.

Multi-language

The cross-national delivery team and document collaboration can be enabled for the corresponding languages; milestones, risks, and acceptance comments are readable, reducing communication loss and misunderstandings in multi-language projects.

Multi-tenant

Delivery center / Regional project isolated operations; the group project portfolio view is aggregated under authorization, project costs and documents are not shared between tenants, meeting multi-legal entity delivery boundaries.

Boundaries & Composition

PMS has WBS baselines, change entry, resource load, and milestone evidence packages; contracts and invoicing can be connected with CRM/finance, and work hours and organization can be reused with EHR. It addresses controlled delivery, rather than replacing professional design tools.

Touchpoints: CRM for opportunity and contract kickoff, EHR for time and assignment, finance for expense posting. Set the write-back direction for contract, time, and cost before building the portfolio board.

Typical breakpoints

Breakpoint	Common cause	Control lever
Project progress relies on weekly reports	WBS is not linked to the work report	Task—Report—Progress Percentage Same Source
Accepted but documentation is incomplete	Deliverables are not set as required	Deliverable Template + Completeness Check
Disconnection between budget and procurement	Purchase request for unlisted items	Project number runs through ERP PO/MO
Execute changes without evaluation	Plan change without approval	Change Order + Baseline Comparison
Risk register zombification	No person in charge and early warning	Risk Rules + Message Push
Difficulties in reconciling multiple projects in the contract	Contract—Project Association Missing	One Contract Multiple Projects Mapping Table
Work hours reporting lag	Mobile work reporting not enabled	Task Reminder + Work Hours Review Chain

Responsibility and Integration

Primary Responsibility:PMS has project planning, WBS execution, deliverables, time reporting, issues/risks, and acceptance/closure evidence; sales contracts and receivables are mainly based on CRM/ERP, and PMS consumes and writes back project dimensions.

Integration Direction (Typical):CRM → Opportunities/Contracts; ERP ←→ Purchase Requisitions/BOM/PO/MO/Shipment/Accounting/Receivables; OA → Approvals (optional); EHR ← Project Work Hours (optional). For manufacturing delivery projects, the responsibility for status updates from BOM issuance to production storage should be clearly defined.

Promote phased implementation and acceptance

Phase One (Templates and Plans): Project templates, L1/L2 WBS, stakeholders and communication mechanisms; plan release and change tracking
Phase Two (Execution and Cost): Work reporting/deliverables/issues and risks; budget and ERP procurement/labor cost reconciliation
Phase Three (Finishing and Collection): Acceptance—Archiving—Payment Closed Loop; Program View and Multi-Project Resource Load Demonstration
The baseline plan and change traceability can be demonstrated, and major deviations trigger risk warnings
Project cost details can be drilled down to ERP procurement/labor sources (according to the integration scope)
Project communication records and risk/issue closure rates can be counted, and the upgrade path and responsible person can be demonstrated.

When not to apply

Use PMS to replace MES for shop floor execution — the manufacturing site is still on MES, PMS manages project milestones
No WBS discipline, only milestone PPT — tasks should be defined first before discussing intelligent early warning
Refusing ERP integration but wanting precise project costing — material and labor costs cannot be reliably aggregated
Mixing Agile and Waterfall approaches without rules — a planning model and change strategy should be selected at the start

Related Practices

Project-based practices focus mainly on plan scenarios and insight criteria; after having an independent acceptance package, they are then upgraded to named cases.

Back to product solutions Take a self-test Download kits Book a demo Get a demo

FAQ

For common questions about the capabilities on this page, take a look here first; if you still have questions, you can contact us.

Which planning modes does JEDP-PMS support?

Supports L1–L3 / WBS levels plus waterfall / agile / incremental, with Gantt and board views. Plan changes must go through a change form with versions. Offline date changes that the system never updates will diverge progress and resource load.

How is the full-cycle cost of a project calculated?

Covers estimate, budget, actuals, close-out, and material-labor-cost rollup. The project ledger is not the general ledger; posting and invoicing still follow ERP. PMS makes project-side collection and variance visible.

How to give early warnings for risks and changes?

Risks go on a register with owner, escalation path, and close criteria. Change, delay, and overdue acceptance need a disposition. This is not a chat reminder. Runtime can complete reviews within that person's own permissions through the API, and does not close risks by itself.

Can it integrate with CRM / ERP / OA?

Yes. Opportunity, contract, and project IDs should align, and milestone triggers for shipment / collection boundaries must be written down. Integration failures must be visible to the business—not reconciled only in IT email.

How to manage multiple projects simultaneously?

Portfolios, resource load, and document completeness share one view. Overload should be explicit—not every project filled independently. Acceptance and collection tick by milestone; missing documents must not fake close-out.